I've checked John Palmer's book, and he does not mention anything about rinsing before steeping. I'm wondering the purpose of rinsing the grains and the rationale behind it. Could Oliver or anyone help to advise a newbie? Thank you.Didn't rinse the grains, hence the low original gravity; you live and learn.
Rinsing specialty grains
Rinsing specialty grains
Regarding Oliver's No.5 Pale Ale, he mentioned this:
-
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Thursday Aug 26, 2004 10:43 am
- Location: Lucan, Ontario, Canada
You should probably do a "mini-sparge" with the specialty grains. After you steep you (ideally) pour the liquid through a strainer to filter out the husks and that, leaving you with a strainer full of grains that still have a significant amount of sugar stuck to them. What I do when I do extract batches is to heat up ~1.5-2L of water in an electric kettle and rinse the grains with this water to remove more sugar. You want the water hot, but not boiling since boiling water may extract unwanted stuff from the husks (although given the small amounts of grain used, it's probably not too big of a deal even if you do use boiling water) when you rinse.
-
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Thursday Aug 26, 2004 10:43 am
- Location: Lucan, Ontario, Canada
Oliver,
I never count on my specialties to add anything else but colour or aroma. That way I am always nicely suprised if I get boost (you wouldn't add 2 kilos of Crystal on 5 gallons simply for effect would you?)
Dogger
I never count on my specialties to add anything else but colour or aroma. That way I am always nicely suprised if I get boost (you wouldn't add 2 kilos of Crystal on 5 gallons simply for effect would you?)
Dogger
"Listening to someone who brews their own beer is like listening to a religous fanatic talk about the day he saw the light" Ross Murray, Montreal Gazette
Only tried once with specialty grains. Didn't know I had to sparge. Followed the directions that came with it and which had me boil can, malt and grain gently for 20 minutes. add hop at end and stand for 10 mins before straining.
Came out good but what I did end up with was a large amount of sediment in the bottom of the fermentor. Is this normal? Also when bottled I ended up with a thick layer of sediment, which racking would have solved.
Is this process correct?
Came out good but what I did end up with was a large amount of sediment in the bottom of the fermentor. Is this normal? Also when bottled I ended up with a thick layer of sediment, which racking would have solved.
Is this process correct?
BPJ
-
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Thursday Aug 26, 2004 10:43 am
- Location: Lucan, Ontario, Canada
BPJ,
All the reading I have done indicates that boiling grains is bad as it starts to release phenols over 170 deg F. Phenols make your beer taste bad. Sounds like it worked for you though. I am thinking the left over stuff you are talking about is called "trub" which you would like to leave behind. It can start to break down and add bad tastes.
And Yes, I would believe that extra racking would reduce the sediment in the final product
Dogger
All the reading I have done indicates that boiling grains is bad as it starts to release phenols over 170 deg F. Phenols make your beer taste bad. Sounds like it worked for you though. I am thinking the left over stuff you are talking about is called "trub" which you would like to leave behind. It can start to break down and add bad tastes.
And Yes, I would believe that extra racking would reduce the sediment in the final product
Dogger
"Listening to someone who brews their own beer is like listening to a religous fanatic talk about the day he saw the light" Ross Murray, Montreal Gazette
-
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Thursday Aug 26, 2004 10:43 am
- Location: Lucan, Ontario, Canada
Not a clue,
I could figure it out but I don't feel like it right now
Friggin Canadians, especially my vintage that had to learn both systems. We operate best in miles per litre and kgs per deg F and furlongs per fortnight and work measured in metre lbs and then we get to dink around with our funky American neighbours who figure 5 gallons is 19 Litres and not 23.
No wonder I come home and don't want to figure out what a buck 70 is in deg C
Dogger
I could figure it out but I don't feel like it right now

Friggin Canadians, especially my vintage that had to learn both systems. We operate best in miles per litre and kgs per deg F and furlongs per fortnight and work measured in metre lbs and then we get to dink around with our funky American neighbours who figure 5 gallons is 19 Litres and not 23.
No wonder I come home and don't want to figure out what a buck 70 is in deg C


Dogger
"Listening to someone who brews their own beer is like listening to a religous fanatic talk about the day he saw the light" Ross Murray, Montreal Gazette
-
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Thursday Aug 26, 2004 10:43 am
- Location: Lucan, Ontario, Canada
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 3424
- Joined: Thursday Jul 22, 2004 1:22 am
- Location: West Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Dogger,
My problem was that, as this was one of my first brews, all the specialty grain went in with the liquid malt to be boiled up.
As such, I think that the grains absorbed sugars, which instead of sparging I just strained out and chucked away.
That's why I think the gravity was a bit low.
Cheers,
Oliver
My problem was that, as this was one of my first brews, all the specialty grain went in with the liquid malt to be boiled up.
As such, I think that the grains absorbed sugars, which instead of sparging I just strained out and chucked away.
That's why I think the gravity was a bit low.
Cheers,
Oliver
thanks to everyone for providing a newbie valuable information. Based on what I've read, I formulating a recipe for my next brew:
1.7kg Black rock nut brown ale
1.5kg liquid pale malt extract (Morgan's unhopped pale)
200g Crystal Malt
50g Chocolate malt
Safale yeast S04
12g Fuggles (steep 10mins in 2 litre hot water for hop tea)
Any comments is most welcome. Will this be too sweet? I'm torn between adding 1kg of the unhopped pale, or the full 1.5kg. Measuring out the 1kg would be a big hassle though. Thanks in advance!
1.7kg Black rock nut brown ale
1.5kg liquid pale malt extract (Morgan's unhopped pale)
200g Crystal Malt
50g Chocolate malt
Safale yeast S04
12g Fuggles (steep 10mins in 2 litre hot water for hop tea)
Any comments is most welcome. Will this be too sweet? I'm torn between adding 1kg of the unhopped pale, or the full 1.5kg. Measuring out the 1kg would be a big hassle though. Thanks in advance!
-
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Thursday Aug 26, 2004 10:43 am
- Location: Lucan, Ontario, Canada
Keat,
go with full 1.5, No need to be pussy footing around.
The rest of the recipe looks good. Just to be on the safe side a bit of Irish Moss wouldn't hurt in the last 15 min of the boil. It will take out the chill haze which will form from the proteins extracted from the crystal. I know you are using the chocolate malt which sohould do the same thing but I haven't always had it work so...... just to be safe
Chill Haze wont hurt you, it just makes your beer cloudy when you chill it. I have some right now, it doesn't affect taste, only appearence
And take the 12 grams Fuggles and toss them in for the final minute of the boil, I think it will be better and it will stop dinking around with some tea, I haven't seen any difference in the two and having it all contained is in one pot is better as far as I am concerned. But thats up to you, one just seems a bit more fussy for no real impact or value added.
Dogger
go with full 1.5, No need to be pussy footing around.
The rest of the recipe looks good. Just to be on the safe side a bit of Irish Moss wouldn't hurt in the last 15 min of the boil. It will take out the chill haze which will form from the proteins extracted from the crystal. I know you are using the chocolate malt which sohould do the same thing but I haven't always had it work so...... just to be safe
Chill Haze wont hurt you, it just makes your beer cloudy when you chill it. I have some right now, it doesn't affect taste, only appearence
And take the 12 grams Fuggles and toss them in for the final minute of the boil, I think it will be better and it will stop dinking around with some tea, I haven't seen any difference in the two and having it all contained is in one pot is better as far as I am concerned. But thats up to you, one just seems a bit more fussy for no real impact or value added.
Dogger
"Listening to someone who brews their own beer is like listening to a religous fanatic talk about the day he saw the light" Ross Murray, Montreal Gazette
-
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Thursday Aug 26, 2004 10:43 am
- Location: Lucan, Ontario, Canada
nut brown ale
Hi keat
I was wondering how your nut-brown ale went; I am planning to do a similar one in the next week or two. I was going to increases the crystal to 500g and the chocolate to 250-300g and with the addition of 300-450g of dark brown sugar. Any suggestion on this recipes or experience with the brew would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Mr H
I was wondering how your nut-brown ale went; I am planning to do a similar one in the next week or two. I was going to increases the crystal to 500g and the chocolate to 250-300g and with the addition of 300-450g of dark brown sugar. Any suggestion on this recipes or experience with the brew would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Mr H
keat wrote:thanks to everyone for providing a newbie valuable information. Based on what I've read, I formulating a recipe for my next brew:
1.7kg Black rock nut brown ale
1.5kg liquid pale malt extract (Morgan's unhopped pale)
200g Crystal Malt
50g Chocolate malt
Safale yeast S04
12g Fuggles (steep 10mins in 2 litre hot water for hop tea)
Any comments is most welcome. Will this be too sweet? I'm torn between adding 1kg of the unhopped pale, or the full 1.5kg. Measuring out the 1kg would be a big hassle though. Thanks in advance!
"Work is the curse of the drinking class."