Length of Primary Fermentation

General homebrew discussion, tips and help on kit and malt extract brewing, and talk about equipment. Queries on sourcing supplies and equipment should go in The Store.
Post Reply
sparkious
Posts: 18
Joined: Monday Nov 22, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Brisbane

Length of Primary Fermentation

Post by sparkious »

I've only just started using safale yeasts instead of the supplied kit yeast and have noticed a considerable time difference in fermentation. The kit yeasts (coopers, morgans etc.) seem to ferment out just over a week @ 22-24 c and the safale seems to be taking two to three weeks. Is this normal and if so is it a problem leaving it in that long on the yeast cake , my local H.B guy seemed to think that after two weeks you should be either raking into another bin or bottling anyway as it could " spoil ". If anyone has some answers I'd love to know. Also just like to say that this site is 'ken awesome and has been a handy resource many times over.
db
Posts: 672
Joined: Friday Oct 15, 2004 2:29 pm
Location: sydney

Post by db »

in my opinion (i mainly brew ales) it doesnt really make much difference as long as you keep the temperature down.. & i've recently heard that, when brewing ales, leaving the beer on the yeast cake for secondary (at the correct temp) can help to 'clean' the beer up quicker, opposed to racking for secondary.. lagers on the other hand apparently need to be racked
Chris
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra

Post by Chris »

Lagers generally need to be racked for the exact same reason as ales- to avoid crazy flavours from yeast autolysis. The racking of a lager is also often so that it can be cold conditioned in another vessel (to free up your fermenter.

Your HB guy is proporting the myth of the ages regarding HB:

HB will get infected if you look at it wrong.

This is a myth. You can leave ales and lagers on the cake for as much, or as little time as you want. Personally, I rack both after about a week, and leave in secondary sometimes indefinately. As long as you have a good seal in your fermenter, you will be fine. The beer will not go "off."

If you are worried about your lid- as many brewers are, just use gladwrap.

Finally, brewing is meant to be easy. Ancient egyptians did it without hydrometers, kit & kilos, brew enhancer No. 2, etc. It is really a very simple process, but people build so much mystery around it. Relax people. :-)
Dogger Dan
Posts: 3168
Joined: Thursday Aug 26, 2004 10:43 am
Location: Lucan, Ontario, Canada

Post by Dogger Dan »

Until you have an infected brew, the cleanliness is no myth.

I get funky flavours off the trub after a week, so yes I like to transfer. I have never had the yeast cook off and I have had them sit on yeast bed for months. In fact a couple have sat on yeast beds for a year. Anyone who bottle conditions has the brew sitting on a yeast bed

Dogger
"Listening to someone who brews their own beer is like listening to a religous fanatic talk about the day he saw the light" Ross Murray, Montreal Gazette
Chris
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra

Post by Chris »

I didn't think that this post was about cleanliness. I thought that it was about when to rack?

As I mentioned before, I usually rack after a week as well.

There will always be a yeast bed (assuming no-one here filters) after racking. I was referring to the primary yeast cake.
db
Posts: 672
Joined: Friday Oct 15, 2004 2:29 pm
Location: sydney

Post by db »

Chris wrote:Personally, I rack both after about a week, and leave in secondary sometimes indefinately.
you are the same chris (blackdragon8888) who was very recently asking this question on grumpys?

http://www.grumpys.com.au/read.php3?id=62442

(i have a forum problem :oops: )
Chris
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra

Post by Chris »

db, I don't post on grumpys. sometimes on AHB.
Chris
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra

Post by Chris »

Oh no! there is more that one Chris out there homebrewing! :o I am so disillusioned.
db
Posts: 672
Joined: Friday Oct 15, 2004 2:29 pm
Location: sydney

Post by db »

Chris wrote:Oh no! there is more that one Chris out there homebrewing! :o I am so disillusioned.
& he has the same email address as you too! (edit: well he did have until your recent edit)

http://www.homebrewandbeer.com/forum/vi ... c&start=23
Chris wrote:db, I don't post on grumpys. sometimes on AHB.
cut the rubbish Chris

(sorry for the hi-jack guys :oops: )
sparkious
Posts: 18
Joined: Monday Nov 22, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by sparkious »

Thanks guys , I will keep my Blackrock I.P.A in for another week and hopefully it will have finished bubbling by then.
thehipone
Posts: 266
Joined: Tuesday Sep 21, 2004 12:20 pm
Location: Brisbane, QLD

Post by thehipone »

Chris wrote:
This is a myth. You can leave ales and lagers on the cake for as much, or as little time as you want. Personally, I rack both after about a week, and leave in secondary sometimes indefinately. As long as you have a good seal in your fermenter, you will be fine. The beer will not go "off."


Finally, brewing is meant to be easy. Ancient egyptians did it without hydrometers, kit & kilos, brew enhancer No. 2, etc. It is really a very simple process, but people build so much mystery around it. Relax people. :-)
Autolysis is not a myth, but you can believe it is if you want. Your comment that you can leave it on the cake as long as you want is just wrong.

Yes the egyptians did make beer. They also used a straw to punch through the crust on top so they could actually drink it. Thankfully, there is a lot of SCIENCE out there that helps people understand how to make better beers. Sure, you dont need to understand all the science, It is still somewhat an art form, but the better you understand what is going on, the better control you have over your product.
Chris
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra

Post by Chris »

Chris wrote:Lagers generally need to be racked for the exact same reason as ales- to avoid crazy flavours from yeast autolysis.
I think if you reread the first part of my post, you will see that I do not think autolysis to be a myth. Instead, I am saying that beer just "going off" is a bit of a myth. People seem to keep alluding to the fact that beer seems to spontaneously go off, which I believe to be a big myth. This is a statement that can stand alone, completely disregarding yeast cakes if necessary.
Post Reply