Reducing sediment in brews with low flocculating yeasts...

General homebrew discussion, tips and help on kit and malt extract brewing, and talk about equipment. Queries on sourcing supplies and equipment should go in The Store.
User avatar
James L
Posts: 1045
Joined: Thursday Jun 07, 2007 10:11 am
Location: Perth WA

Reducing sediment in brews with low flocculating yeasts...

Post by James L »

Its been a week since i bottled my Hefe Weissebier, and the main thing i see when i put the bottle up to the light is about 3-4mm of sediment at the botttom of the bottle (500ml).

I brewed this beer for about a week, then it was in secondary for about 2.

I removed about all the yeast i possilby could, but with such a low flocculating yeast (Wyeast 3068), what else can i do to remove sediment next time?

James
Image
I freely admit that I was Very Very Drunk....
"They speak of my drinking, but never consider my thirst."
User avatar
rwh
Posts: 2810
Joined: Friday Jun 16, 2006 1:47 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Post by rwh »

I thought the beer was supposed to be cloudy with that kind of yeast. But to reduce sediment, you can (in order of how keen you have to be):

1. Rack
2. Rack for longer
3. Rack again
4. Add finings
5. Cold condition
6. Filter
w00t!
Chris
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra

Post by Chris »

Yep. Short of filtering, only time and lower temps will drop that yeast. Maybe some finings, but avoid generic gelatine finings- they are useless.
chris.
Posts: 912
Joined: Wednesday Feb 08, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Brewing
Contact:

Post by chris. »

Chris wrote:avoid generic gelatine finings- they are useless.
How so?
Last edited by chris. on Saturday Oct 13, 2007 5:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Chris
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra

Post by Chris »

They don't tend to reduce suspended yeast levels, mainly protein.
chris.
Posts: 912
Joined: Wednesday Feb 08, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Brewing
Contact:

Post by chris. »

Wrong way around mate. Gelatine is positively charged which attracts the negatively charged yeast.
Irish Moss, Whirfloc, & PVPP etc. are used to drop proteins.
Last edited by chris. on Saturday Oct 13, 2007 5:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Aussie Claret
Posts: 655
Joined: Thursday Sep 01, 2005 11:55 am
Location: Gold Coast

Post by Aussie Claret »

As has already been said a Hefe is supposed to be cloudy and the yeast is essential for the flavour of this style, if you want it crystal clear and I'm presuming you are making AG treat with polyclar to remove the protein haze then filter to remove any sludge / yeast / trub.

If you are not making AG then you don't need to polyclar, just filter.

Other options yes treat with gelatin, and CC which will assist in helping the yeast drop out of suspension.
AC
There's nothing wrong with having nothing to say - unless you insist on saying it. (Anonymous)
Chris
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra

Post by Chris »

Yeah, my mistake. Nothing wrong with geletin.
chris.
Posts: 912
Joined: Wednesday Feb 08, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Brewing
Contact:

Post by chris. »

Chris wrote:Yeah, my mistake. Nothing wrong with geletin.
Whats geletin? :?
Last edited by chris. on Saturday Oct 13, 2007 5:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Chris
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra

Post by Chris »

Get over it.
morgs
Posts: 313
Joined: Tuesday Jun 13, 2006 8:36 pm

Post by morgs »

Just do it !
Purple monkey dishwasher!
chris.
Posts: 912
Joined: Wednesday Feb 08, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Brewing
Contact:

Post by chris. »

morgs wrote:Just do it !
Already did it.
Last edited by chris. on Saturday Oct 13, 2007 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Heals
Posts: 171
Joined: Thursday Jul 12, 2007 11:32 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by Heals »

I've noticed there is a fair whack of sediment at the bottle of most of the bottles from my first batch. This doesn't really bother me as it's pretty easy to pour them without disturbing the sediment - however, are there any negatives to having sediment remain in the bottom of a sealed bottle for long periods of time?
Image
Explore your HOPTIONS!
240+ varieties of hops, expert descriptions, substitutes, beer styles and more. hopslist.com is the largest source of hops info on the web.
Chris
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra

Post by Chris »

Quite the contrary. Sediment is what keeps your beer alive. Rather than that crap you get from CUB and LN.
User avatar
Heals
Posts: 171
Joined: Thursday Jul 12, 2007 11:32 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by Heals »

Cheers chris, still learning the ins and outs!

I don't mind the sediment at all, most of the time I roll my brew around, get it nice and cloudy and consume, however that's only because I'm used to doing it with Coopers beers.
Image
Explore your HOPTIONS!
240+ varieties of hops, expert descriptions, substitutes, beer styles and more. hopslist.com is the largest source of hops info on the web.
Chris
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tuesday Oct 04, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Northern Canberra

Post by Chris »

Heals.

The only beer I mix the yeast through is Coopers. When it comes to HB, I avoid. I don't know what the difference is, just that Coopers yeast adds to the beer, whereas HB yeast doesn't seem to.

At least it helps avoid hangovers.
petesbrew
Posts: 167
Joined: Tuesday Feb 13, 2007 3:23 pm

Post by petesbrew »

I've got a stout happening at the moment, which has a fair bit of sediment floating through it (mainly choc grain and fuggles pellets).
I'm considering racking it to the secondary for a week, with some gelatin finings. I've used this in the past with some pale ales and am happy with the results.

Just wondering though, would the finings take away some of the "stoutiness" from my stout? I mean, the flavour is tops at the moment, and apart from picking bits of hops from between teeth it's fantastic.
User avatar
KEG
Posts: 1682
Joined: Thursday Dec 21, 2006 9:02 am

Post by KEG »

racking it alone should be enough to reduce all that sediment a whole lot anyway
Image
petesbrew
Posts: 167
Joined: Tuesday Feb 13, 2007 3:23 pm

Post by petesbrew »

Cheers Keg. I'm just a bit hesitant to leave it more than a week there. I've had a couple of dud brews from racking before, so really only do it when I have to now.
User avatar
KEG
Posts: 1682
Joined: Thursday Dec 21, 2006 9:02 am

Post by KEG »

as long as you're really clean about it all - sanitising the inside and outside of the racking hose, the tap, the racking fermenter, etc - and as long as you don't splash it about but let it flow gently into the secondary to avoid oxidation, you have a really, really minimal chance of a cock-up :lol:

also, you might want to boil a quarter of a cup of malt/dextrose in maybe 2/3 of a cup of water and put that in first. gives the yeast something to eat to create some CO2 for the headspace. Make sure you don't use a sealed secondary if you do this though.
Image
Post Reply