Page 2 of 2
Posted: Saturday Oct 07, 2006 2:39 pm
by blandy
True, Crownies are not about drinking, they're about being SEEN drinking them. Depending on who sees you this can be a good or a bad thing.
BTW, would we all be more ashamed if Australia was more famous for Fosters or VB?
Posted: Saturday Oct 07, 2006 2:52 pm
by Eureka
Crownies + a $9 price tag at a ritzy hotel? I'd rather drink a bottle of spumantie.
Foster's
Posted: Wednesday Oct 11, 2006 1:22 pm
by derfly
As a new member of this forum, I do have a cofession to make.
While living 6 1/2 years in Germany, my local "Kneipe" (pub) had Foster's on tap. Now this is certainly not the only beer I drank there, I did end up drinking many, many 1/2 litres during my sojourn.
Brewed by Holsten in Hamburg, it conforms to the "Deutsches Reinheitsgebot" and is eminently drinkable.
I won't say the same about Foster's brewed here.
Posted: Thursday Oct 12, 2006 10:06 pm
by pacman
Lucky bugger!!
Posted: Wednesday Oct 25, 2006 6:21 pm
by beerdrinker
fosters should come up with a new beer with the german purity law!!! maybe not cause they wouldnt be able to sell thier other shite
then again i guess good marketing can sell almost anything
