I tried the Black Rock Dry Lager with the dry Enzyme sachet a few times & had trouble with infections each time, I put it down to the long lag time of the "Lazy" yeast, could it have been the enzyme???
billybushcook wrote:I tried the Black Rock Dry Lager with the dry Enzyme sachet a few times & had trouble with infections each time, I put it down to the long lag time of the "Lazy" yeast, could it have been the enzyme???
Mick.
Yeah, Mick that's exactly why I asked. I had a sample of black rock cerveza a few years back from a homebrew store is Brisbane and it was awsome. Bought myself a can there and then and travelled back to Yeppoon in anticipation. Was one of the very very few(less than 3) beers that I simply had to poor down the sink . However, I've since used brewcraft sachets for 40+ brews without a problem.
Did that kit come with one of those dodgy enzymes that help the yeast ferment out more of the malt?
Oliver
Oliver, curious as to what you mean by this. I've used dry enzme sachets (brewceller) for years without a problem. Are the Blackrock sachets dodgy???
Hirns
Better late than never for a reply ... what I meant was that lots of homebrewers frown on using enzyme because it's "unnatural". Many prefer to adjust the ingredients such as add less malt and more highly fermentable sugars (or mash at a lower temperature) to get a thinner body/low-carb effect.
I've experimented with using dry enzyme with good results. The trick is designing the recipe around the fact that you're going to end up with all but no malt profile in the finished product; ie. lots of late hops.
. However, I've since used brewcraft sachets for 40+ brews without a problem.