Page 1 of 2

Beer and cricket

Posted: Friday Nov 09, 2007 10:48 am
by Chris
Does it get any better than this? Pre-noon beer and cricket. This is the life :D

Posted: Friday Nov 09, 2007 10:57 am
by Rysa
I'm jealous!!!

But 12 hours at double time and a half is good too!!

Posted: Friday Nov 09, 2007 11:29 am
by MOFO
Im in Melbourne on a holiday at mo at the sisters - just about to walk to the beach get me a 6'er and come back and do the same till the girlfriend gets back and we have to go to dinner (she can drive ;))

Hooray for sun, summer and BEER.

Posted: Friday Nov 09, 2007 12:04 pm
by Wassa
Only thing that can beat that is to wake up early and go fishing, come back and screw wife or girlfriend, have breakfast and then sit down with beer and watch cricket for the day.

Posted: Friday Nov 09, 2007 12:05 pm
by Chris
Shouldn't that be: '...screw wife and girlfriend...'

Posted: Friday Nov 09, 2007 2:52 pm
by drsmurto
You can screw a wife, i thought they screwed you? :twisted:

Going home early for a few Alts and some cricket too. You gotta love summer!

Anyone notice Kev hasnt responded to this? Have you worked out the rules yet mate? :lol:

Hang on, you work at home so you are probably sitting there watching it all day and calling it work. Damn i need to find a job i can do from home

Posted: Friday Nov 09, 2007 2:58 pm
by Rysa
True. I haven't seen Kev all day.
Out playing cricket maybe?

Posted: Friday Nov 09, 2007 3:05 pm
by Chris
Kevlis DaSilva. Nice ring to it.

Posted: Friday Nov 09, 2007 3:23 pm
by drsmurto
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: Friday Nov 09, 2007 4:00 pm
by Kevnlis
Sorry guys, I do not like to miss my cricket ;)

Been a great day for watching it too!

Also for you skeptics, I knew how to score cricket before I ever moved to Australia.

Posted: Friday Nov 16, 2007 1:44 pm
by Chris
Ah. This is the life (again) :D More beer, more cricket, a borwn ale that needs racking, and a choc porter on the stove. This is what it's all about.

Back to back debut centuries for Jaques. He looks like he's going to a good player.

Looking weak in the field. Come on Kev, get your team fired up! :D

Posted: Friday Nov 16, 2007 2:54 pm
by MOFO
OK - you can stop talking about it now that I am back at work this week and hankering for a beer.....

Stuff it, I am going to give myself an early leave pass and head to the pub...

Have a good Friday all.... I'm gonna spend it bottling some beers that have been sitting for 3 weeks in primary...

Posted: Friday Nov 16, 2007 9:35 pm
by Kevnlis
Don't forget Mr. Cricket! Another great century... and still going! I don't think these blokes need any 'firing up' they have been fair flogging the poor Sri Lankans... actually does not make for that exciting of a game, I of course want AU to win, but a bit of a fight would be welcomed!

India should have a better show to put on I hope, though it really is pretty hard for anyone in the world to compete with Australia on their own pitches.

Posted: Friday Nov 16, 2007 9:56 pm
by Iron-Haggis
Chris wrote:
Back to back debut centuries for Jaques. He looks like he's going to a good player.
Back to back debut centuries? Sense make not much of. He isn't on debut and his 2nd century can't be a debut century. Been enjyoing a few too many beers there Chris. Lucky bastard. I had to work all bloody day.

Posted: Friday Nov 16, 2007 10:15 pm
by Chris
Kev, I was referring to you playing for the Sri Lankans- see earlier posts.

IH, this is his second batting inning. As there are two batting inning per test match (unless you are playing against the Aussies...) then I consider this to be a continuation of his debut. One of the other commentators also mentioned this point, but I can't remember which one. You'd know if you'd been able to watch it :D

And unfortunately, my last keg ran dry unexpectedly- I only got about 300mL of beer today :(

Posted: Saturday Nov 17, 2007 9:37 pm
by Iron-Haggis
Phil Jaques is currently playing his 4th Test. I know I'm being annoying. Just a little obsessive about my cricket stats.

Posted: Sunday Nov 18, 2007 6:45 am
by Chris
4th? Why do they keep saying debut for the last one? Were the other two for Australia A or something?

Posted: Sunday Nov 18, 2007 7:04 am
by Kevnlis
His debut was Boxing day of '05 against South Africa after Langer was ruled out due to injury. He scored 2 runs in his first innings and a further 28 in the second. He was selected again in '06 to play against Bangladesh but only came up with 66 in that match. Brisbane was his third test match which came nearly 2 yeasr after his real debut. He did however play for a part of the VB series in '05-'06 when Katich went out injured, he scored a 94 in his debut match which is a record for an Australian in their debut ODI match.

Maybe they were calling it his debut because it was the first time he was genuinely picked to be part of the squad? Before that he had only been selected to fill in for injured players. I do think he has earned himself a place as opening batsman for Australia for the time being though ;)

Posted: Sunday Nov 18, 2007 9:43 pm
by Iron-Haggis
It's all about the terminology. Debut century means it's the batsmen first century. When they score a century in their first match it is referred to as "Century on debut".

Posted: Monday Nov 19, 2007 7:39 am
by Chris
Fair enough.

I prefer baseball anyway :D

Not that I'm having a go at cricket though.