If you need any more proof that Australians are some of the luckiest people on the planet, drink a cross-section of American megaswill - then honestly complain about VB!


This thread is worth a look. There are some thoughts on it about Boag's Strongarm and Premium.Boonie wrote:Bloke who lives across the road works for Boags.
He gave me a "Strongarm" bitter. Tasted like medicine.
Has gone to the top of my worst beer list......
Had a James Boags premium and it tasted nicenot alot of flavour or aroma though....but this was straight after the above beer.
![]()
Let me tell you how it could happen, Dogger. First, find a city of 2.8 million people, each of whom have .0001 years, or 53 minutes, worth of brewing experience. That's long enough for most of the residents to travel to and from the local reservoir. Have all of them go urinate in the reservoir. Mix well and toss in some pond scum and pollution for flavor. Bottle. You've got yourself a liquid that meets the requirements set forth above.Dogger Dan wrote:The can claims some 280 years of brewing experience went into this. Not a chance says I...
Actually, Schlitz made both a beer AND a malt liquor, two different products. They still sell the beer, and I think also the malt liquor, to this day, but I think they're under different ownership from what they originally were under.thehipone wrote:aaaahh, good old Schlitz. If the bull on the label didnt tip you off that it was going to be bad...It's actually a "malt Liquor" made in Milwaukee, WIsconsin. Malt liquor is essentially really bad high gravity beer and is designated differently because of some law limiting the amount of alcohol that can be in something while still labelling it as beer...
LOL!thehipone wrote:That's (Schlitz is) a good nominee, unfortunately you cant find it here in Australia.