If Geoff is a barrister, and given my working history of legal work on personal injury claims for an insurer, I can fully understand what he is saying, I think!
You only have to sit in a court room for any length of time to be totally confused, unless you are privy to the inside workings of the language used.
Same with the convoluted workings of the language judges use in their written judgments, to do their best to make them appeal proof, even if their ultimate decision was against all the weight of evidence from a casual observer.
I must say that a lot of what would appear to be totally confusing and contradictory to the average person did make sense in a legally distinctive way.
Doesn't help the average punter, especially after they've downed a few.
That aside, or obiter dictum, I'm looking forward to the update of the tasting notes.
Have a great Christmas and New year break, gentlemen and fellow punters.